When you get your Maintenance Costs vs. Replacement Asset Value RAV down to 2% you join the list of the world best maintenance practitioners. Bring your maintenance costs down to under 1% RAV and you will be the world best maintenance practitioner
Here is a sure path with the best methods to get your company Replacement Asset Value ratio down to 3%, then 2%, and finally 1% of maintenance costs. Drive maintenance costs down as a percentage of RAV and you’ll eventually reach the heights of operational and maintenance success. The path to take is called Plant Wellness Way EAM System-of-Reliability.
You surely get there with the right mix of physical asset management, maintenance management, and reliability improvement processes combined in an outstanding Accuracy Controlled Enterprise work quality management system.
The Plant Wellness Way EAM methodology gives you a simple solution to installing world class practices and the best business processes into your company to get Operational Excellence results.
Maintenance Cost as a proportion of Replacement Asset Value (RAV)
Maintenance cost as a percent of Replacement Asset Value (RAV) is the universal benchmark measure of operating asset performance success.
The RAV tells you how well your expenditure on capital equipment is being looked after. At 20 percent of Replacement Asset Value you spend so much on maintenance each year that you can buy completely new plant for your operation every five years. At 2 percent of Replacement Asset Value you will be in operation for 50 years before your maintenance spend is worth the cost of getting a new plant.
At high RAV your plant and equipment is very expensive to maintain and reflects either 1) aggressive products and environment, 2) very poor operating and maintenance practices, or 3) you brought yourself a ‘dog’ of a plant and now you are stuck with it for years to come.3% RAV can be reached with the right business processes, tools, skills, knowledge and spirit within the maintenance department.
2% RAV can be reached when operations and maintenance team-up and start using the right processes, systems, tools, skills, knowledge and spirit.
1% RAV requires totally new mind-sets and paradigms throughout the business about the way to design, operate and manage your operation.
A simple financial model will help you to relate better to what is possible with your plant and equipment performance.
How often do you want your family car to breakdown on the side of the road? Would you go on a long five day drive with your family if you are sure that the car you drive could breakdown anywhere along the way? Would you be happy for it to breakdown at any place, and at any time?
They are dumb questions! You want your car to go brilliantly until you turn the engine off at your holiday destination. So why should it be any different with the plant and equipment in your business? Are you unsure that for all of next week every piece of your production equipment will run trouble-free at full duty? Running a business by luck is not a good way to stay in business for long!
In April 2002 a renowned manufacturer’s new family car in Australia cost AUD$30,888. The car is designed to have a service every 15,000 kilometers (9,000 miles). The average annual mileage for a regular mid-sized car used by the average family is 20,000 kilometers (12,000 miles). Over three years the car, on average, will travel 60,000 kilometers and have four services. The dealer can provide you with the standard maintenance costs for each type of service the car requires.
The other maintainable components replaced during normal operation are the tires. An average tires last around 80,000 kilometers (50,000 miles). Four suitable tires installed and aligned cost AUD$650.
The information is listed in the table below. From it you can work out the ‘designed’ cost of having the car and its ‘planned’ maintenance cost as a percentage of replacement asset value.
Original cost of car = AUD$30,888
Years of age
Distance Travelled in kilometers
Service Cost AUD$
Tires Cost AUD$
Total Annual Cost AUD$
Annualized Cost AUD$
If the maintenance costs of a family car are 1% to 1.5% of its Replacement Asset Value each year to run, why doesn’t industrial plant and equipment also cost that little to maintain?
There is absolutely no reason that operating plant and equipment as complex as a modern family car cannot be maintained at 1% of its Replacement Asset Value. Even in aggressive mining environments phenomenal improvements in RAV are possible. But first you have to learn to think and behave differently to what you now do—you have to understand how to design and treat your machines and business processes so they can deliver you world class RAV.
You can view an on-going experiment that I run to check the maintenance costs as a percent of RAV for my current car at my car maintenance costs.
How to get maintenance cost down to 3% of Replacement Asset Value
At 3% of Replacement Asset Value you are closing in on the world’s best maintenance practitioners!
This level of accomplishment is possible when the right thinking, the right methods, the right practices and the right attitudes are proactively adopted in the maintenance department.
How to get maintenance cost down to 2% of Replacement Asset Value
At 2% of Replacement Asset Value you are in the forefront with the world’s best maintenance practitioners!
This level of accomplishment is possible when the right thinking, the right methods, the right practices and the right attitudes are proactively adopted and used throughout both operations and maintenance who now work together as a well knit team.
How to get maintenance cost down to 1% of Replacement Asset Value
At 1% of Replacement Asset Value you are the front runner of the world’s best maintenance practitioners.
This level of accomplishment is possible when a quantum change in business thinking and practices are adopted in operations, engineering, and maintenance. It is why we invented the Plant Wellness Way EAM methodology. When you build a Plant Wellness Way EAM System-of-Reliability your operation uses scientific discipline under a regime combining process efficiency and effectiveness improvement, life cycle asset management, maintenance management, systems reliability engineering, and a quality management system to lock all your improvements into place permanently as standard business practice.
How to calculate replacement asset value (RAV)
You can determine your maintenance cost as a percentage of RAV for yourself with the following equation.
Percent of RAV = (Annual Maintenance Cost x 100) / Maintained Assets Replacement Value
There are time related issues that you need to address to determine a current maintained plant RAV that is acceptably close to the real value. RAV means exactly what is says: today’s cost to replace your existing plant with brand new, identical equipment.
It will be impossible to get an exact duplicate plant because equipment manufacturers change their designs, they innovate the production process, they substitute new materials with better properties for old materials, and construction labor and equipment rates change. But you only need a value that is acceptably close to today’s value. To me acceptable close means within 10 percent of the real value.
If your operating plant is less than ten years old just use the original capital cost of your maintained plant. The same plant will be built for less cost today than it was back then, but the difference in costs is not likely to be great.
If your plant is more than ten years old things get complicated. You can increase the original asset values by the average annual inflation for each year since they were built (i.e. a compound value calculation), but you will not be right by a long margin, because the costs of manufacturing will be less today from the effects of innovations that manufacturers, designers and construction contractors introduce. The labor rates will probably track inflation, and maybe even a little more in some industries, but even with labor, modern innovations make labor more efficient today than that of years ago. The same plant built today will be built for much less expense than using the original capital cost inflated up to today’s date.
Plant older than ten years needs alternative ways to determine the RAV than on younger plant. One way is to get the current asset values of your maintained plants from the accountants or insurers (they should regularly revalue the plant and equipment for taxation and insurance reasons). You do not want the depreciated value, rather you want the current asset value as if the operation burnt down and had to be totally rebuilt after the fire.
If the current asset values are several years old you may need to compound them up to a value representing that for today.
One other way to get an estimate of current replacement value of a plant is to use parametric estimates, where statistical relationships of costs across already built plants are used to estimate the cost of building another similar plant. You would track-down several new plants recently built that have similar equipment and processes to your plant and by applying parametric estimating you can arrive at a believable value to replace your operation using current day costs and methods. It is a well used capital project estimating technique and plentiful information is available on the method.
You should also do the replacement asset value estimation in each of the various ways—original full capital cost adjusted for average inflation; current asset value adjusted for average inflation and a parametric estimate—to see how wide is the discrepancy. Then you need to make a judgement call and go with it as a starting point.
Finally, divide the annual total maintenance cost by the RAV (the total cost is the sum of all direct and indirect maintenance costs that you incur to maintain your plant and equipment. The percentage figure that results will be as close as you can get to your current maintenance cost as a percentage of RAV as current information allows you to achieve.
Purists will argue that your RAV is not right. It never can be right because it contains estimated values that always change. It only needs to be within plus or minus ten percent of actual value to help you understand if you have problems with your business and where they might be hiding.
It probably is more important that you establish a benchmark RAV with which you can measure your improvement (or back-sliding) each year in a standard, consistent way, than spend months playing with imperfect numbers.
As you get more comfortable and conversant with your asset values you will naturally change and improve the accuracy of your RAV estimation.
One other issue that you may need to address is to separate the cost of maintenance for civil and structural assets from that for mechanical assets. Mechanical asset cost more to maintain because their parts move. They wear-out faster and require more maintenance than stationary assets. Stationary assets like tanks, silos, buildings, roads, etc. have vastly different maintenance costs to machinery. You probably should do a separate RAV for each category, as well as having a combined RAV for the Operation.